Tankless Water Heaters have become very popular in recent
years. While there are some applications where these types
of units are a good choice for providing Domestic Hot
Water, they are easily bested in systems where there is
already a boiler providing hot water for heating. Boilers
in general, have a long, reliable, and highly efficient
service life. When combined with an Indirect Water Heater,
are an EXCELLENT source of hot water for household use.
Below is fine article that explains the issue clearly.
Reprinted from the June/July 2007 issue of
Plumbing
& Hydronic Contractor News Magazine
Hydronic
kiss leads to mechanical matrimony
BY RICH McNALLY and JOHN VASTYAN,
contributing writers
It’s now official. The relationship between the
boiler and his chosen mate is recognized by the hydronic
community as one worthy of long-term marriage. But the
honeymoon’s over, and it’s now off to the
races.
An indirect-fired water heater gives us all the power of a
NASCAR racer for supplying virtually limitless hot water
for bathing and washing, yet with the fuel economy of Mini
Cooper!
Modern bathrooms are equipped with waterfall tub fills and
multi-nozzle body washers instead of the old 2-gpm
showerheads we once used to carefully moisten ourselves
with. These new fixtures demand huge quantities of hot
water. The sudden loads require that we store plenty of
reserve, but also that we put it there and keep it there
without breaking the bank. If that sounds to you like the
perfect job description for an indirect water heater,
you’re right.
Modern hydronics now provide what consumers want most from
their home’s most essential mechanical systems --
maximum heating comfort, and endless hot water at a lower
operating cost than ever before.
Indirect water heaters might be the most significant
technology enhancement to enter the residential hot water
industry in the last 30 years. Two key needs have driven
demand for these incredibly useful and practical heating
systems here in the United States: fuel efficiency, and an
ever-increasing need for more hot water.
Hot tubs, large baths, multi-head showers and bigger homes
with more bathrooms -- all create a voracious appetite for
hot water and, fortunately, these heaters can shovel it
faster than anything else.
Until indirects came into play, boiler-integrated tankless
coils ruled alongside direct-fired tanks. The internal
tankless coils, in either a gas or oil boiler, are
inherently inefficient, but inexpensive. As early as 1935,
advertisements promised “free hot water” during
the winter, but there certainly was a cost penalty for
firing the boiler all summer long: laboratory tests in the
50s showed that tankless heaters with large-volume boilers
were about 18% efficient during the non-heating season!
Of course, even during the heating season, hot water coming
out of the tankless coil requires fuel. Today’s
tankless units, like earlier models, rely on high internal
boiler convection and very high boiler temperatures.
Because their gasketed attaching plates are metals
dissimilar to the boilers’, over time they all leak
at least a little, usually onto sensitive components.
They’re also notoriously troublesome because, as hard
or otherwise untreated water passes through them, the
superheated coils collect mineral deposits that quickly
diminish coil efficiency and then require costly acid bath
cleanings.
Electric water heaters are almost 100% efficient, but
utility companies don’t generally share well and
operating costs can be comparatively high, especially when
loaded with enough kilowatts to fully satisfy modern
demands.
Direct fossil fuel-fired tank water heaters are all moving
toward greater and greater operational efficiencies, but
some of them also have a problem with the temperature
difference between the combustion passages and the large
tank of relatively cool water either above them or around
them. That difference puts a lot of stress on metals and
glass linings, causing fatigue, thus shortening lifespans.
This is especially true when they are harnessed for use as
a heat source, primary or auxiliary.
Indirects, on the other hand, use the high efficiency and
the inherent sturdiness of modern hydronic boilers by
becoming an attached “zone.” This arrangement
now mechanically connects and, with use of a circulator,
directs the boiler’s full power to heating potable
water in a highly insulated tank without the stress, and
with the efficiency that’s so hard to combine in
direct-fired tanks.
As an indication of their efficiency and ability to produce
hot water, many indirect-fired water heaters provide two to
four times the recovery rate of gas-fired water heaters.
They also offer two to three times the peak flow of a
tankless coil, and three to six times peak output for
comparably sized electric water heaters. (Though when
volume and efficiency are not key concerns, these other
units generally meet the need quite well.)
With indirect water heaters, the relatively simpler tank
designs and lower temperature difference between the
heating medium and heated potable water also allows for the
use of potentially longer lasting tank materials like
plastics, cupronickel, stainless steel, as well as high
R-value insulations for optimal storage efficiency. Glass
or stone-lined steel tanks -- to protect the steel from
electrolysis and natural oxidation -- now have a better
chance of long life as well. Most indirects also do not
require the use of a mixing valve, allowing better flow
rates and fewer mechanical issues in that flow.
Indirects are almost always the single largest zone
attached to the heating plant and the most noticed if
underpowered. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to
heat water enough to raise its temperature 90 or 100
degrees at a flow rate sufficient to satisfy the modern
family.
If we’ve seen one common problem with indirect jobs
over the years, it’s improper supply of boiler energy
to the tank, no matter the brand. It starts with the boiler
size. Most 30- to 40-gal. tanks, with a 15- or 20-sq.-ft.
edr (equivalent direct radiation) coil, can absorb a boiler
output of 120,000 to 130,000 Btus, generally more than the
average home’s heat load. Clearly, under-sizing the
boiler to match the heating load could adversely effect the
indirect’s performance.
What might not be quite as obvious is properly sizing the
pump and piping, along with prioritizing with good piping
and controls. Even an oversized boiler doesn’t have a
chance if the piping or pumping between it and the indirect
is too small or not oriented for priority. Flow rates and
temperatures presented to the unit make it perform or not
perform. It’s really that simple.
Indirects, like any popular product, are available in a
wide variety of configurations and sizes from a number of
manufacturers, European and domestic, each claiming
superior something or other. There are similarities, and
vast differences, among them. Most use a heat exchanger
coil submersed in the potable water to be heated.
There is a diversity of coils, and materials used to
manufacture them. Some use copper alloys such as
cupronickel. These coils are often finned to gain surface
area for more efficient heat transfer in a shorter length
of tube. There are those in the industry that believe
tube-finning leads to premature accumulation of
precipitates, so they choose to use a smooth-surfaced tube.
To boost efficiency and output, that requires a longer
tube, replicating the same effective area for heat
transfer.
Though there are as many designs as there are suppliers,
most commonly potable water is piped to the inside tank,
while boiler water fills the outer tank, surrounding and
heating the inside tank. No coils to think about, but when
the inner tank’s thermostat is satisfied, the large
mass of 180- to 200-degree boiler water is left surrounding
it. Heat migration (hot moves to cold) then raises the
inner tank temperature over the stat set point. This style
then recommends a mixing valve to overcome this issue
… and we thought we left mix valves back in the
tankless era!
All of the leading manufacturers of indirect units insulate
their tanks very well. Most claim losses of two degrees or
less per hour during standby; some measure heat loss at
less than 1/2°F per hour!
The physics of combustion efficiency involve the struggle
between reducing mass in the boiler and the medium to gain
speed, while maintaining good steady-state efficiency. It
means cold-starting for greater delta T, or temperature
difference, and lower stack temperatures while avoiding
condensation. It also means improving surface area within
the combustion chamber and flue passages so that refractory
is minimized and hot gasses give up more energy without
increasing the boiler mass or creating “cold flame
syndrome.” Optimizing combustion so that the gasses
give up energy to the iron in a smaller area is also part
of the equation.
Why the mention of all this? An amazing evolution took
place not long after introduction of the indirect water
heater into to our hydronic marketplace. Boiler design
engineers soon directed their interests and ingenuity into
development of vessels that no longer needed high internal
convection, or a large cavity and port to accommodate an
internal tankless coil.
The market no longer required these features to support
sales for that old design style. Manufacturers were soon
focusing on the development of lower mass, higher-pressure,
lighter weight, and lower temperature equipment. The
Europeans had been doing this successfully for years, and
suddenly our market was ready.
Quickly, we were introduced to new features and a new
vocabulary. Boilers were “pressure fired,”
“cast over” (no tankless port), “low
mass,” “fully-modulating,”
“condensing” and offered “encapsulated
combustion,” and were referred to as “radiant
friendly” or “radiant-ready.”
Ah, yes. Low temperature radiant floor heating. With these
slick, new enhancements to the venerable boiler --
especially considering the newest generation of
energy-miser condensing boiler systems -- there’s now
an ideal relationship between the boiler, indirect-fired
water heater, and radiant panels. Connect all three
partners with good primary/secondary piping and you have a
system straight from the hydronic gods.
At the same time, consumer demand has pushed the
development and sale of unprecedented numbers of
multiple-head showers and waterfall baths. Informed
consumers also want to step out of that “body
wash” onto a warm tile floor! And, why not? Your
customer should have nothing but the best from you and
their hydronic system. With hydronic radiant heating, they
can have just that. No more drafty, cold floors. No more
“satisfied thermostat and unsatisfied
customer.” Radiant heat, warming the room from the
floor up, keeps the part of your body that’s hardest
to heat (your feet) toasty warm, while your head stays as
cool as Paul Newman’s. Most people find that with
radiant heat, a lower thermostat set point feels more
comfortable than a higher one with convective heating.
Imagine: all of this comfort from a heating system that
operates about 30% more efficiently than a convective
system! Therein lies the kinship between indirects and
radiant heat, getting the very best, while paying the very
least to get it.
With a boiler operating efficiently and happily, a
well-insulated water heater making water hot and keeping it
that way, warm floors bringing you the heat energy you
want, where you want it... you’ve got a system
that’s optimized for maximum comfort, efficiency and
economy. There is no greater, greener way to operate a
fossil fuel system without spending a king’s ransom.
Fortunately, there’s a diversity of manufacturers who
offer some outstanding equipment. Among the many suppliers
of this technology, tank sizes range from 20 to 120 gallons
and more, with prices that vary greatly, with a retail
price range at the 40-gallon size from $500 to $2,000, and
from $1,000 to $4,500 for 120-gallon units. The wide
variance in pricing stems from quality of craftsmanship,
accommodation for faster heat recovery, ease of
installation and maintenance, resistance to deterioration
and mineral build-up, integration with boiler controls,
efficiency, standby losses and expected service life.
As examples of this technology, two leading suppliers,
Bradford White and Laars Heating Systems Company, are among
several U.S. firms that offer indirect water heaters.
Bradford White Corp. offers double- and single-wall
PowerCor indirect water heaters that provide standby heat
loss at less than 1/2°F per hour, Vitraglas lining,
dielectric waterway fittings, protective magnesium anode
rod, T&P relief valve opening on top of unit, brass
drain valve, 2" non-cfc foam insulation and a 10-year
limited warranty on tank and heat exchanger. Bradford
White’s PowerCor and PowerStor were engineered to
provide the lowest pressure drop, the highest hot water
output and the highest amount of effective actual heat
transfer area of any indirect fired water heater in the
industry.
And, at this year’s AHR Expo, Bradford White
introduced its Combi2 combination water and space heating
system: a direct-fired, quick-recovery water heater that --
unique to the industry -- also “acts” like an
indirect system because of its internal, 11/2" o.d.
glass-coated heat exchanger coil that ends with 3/4" npt
connections, welded to the tank. It comes in 50 and 75 gal.
sizes in power-vented and atmospheric-vented models and, in
addition to meeting domestic water heating needs, these
units serve as an ideal heat source for a variety of
radiant heat applications. The system’s closed-loop,
double-wall carbon steel coil provides a positive leak
path. The coil’s large diameter assures low-pressure
drop (8 gpm flow gives 2.3 ft. of head loss) and super-fast
recovery.
And offered by Laars Heating Systems Company, the
Laars-Stor single- and double-wall indirect water heaters
offer a super-efficient, 11/2" glass coated steel heat
exchanger, sediment reduction system, three protective
anode rods, a glass-lined tank, fully automatic Honeywell
controls, a brass drain valve, T&P relief valve, supply
and return connections and a five-year limited warranty of
the steel tank and heat exchanger.
Chesapeake, Va.-based Rich McNally has been eastern
regional sales manager for Springfield, Mo.-based Watts
Radiant for four years. Watts Radiant is the largest
American-owned radiant heat manufacturer. His 25 years in
HVAC distribution include sales of five different brands of
indirects, giving him ample experience in selling,
installing and troubleshooting water heating equipment. He
spent two years as a rep for hydronics manufacturers.
John Vastyan is president of Common Ground, Uncommon
Communications, based in Manheim, Pa. He has 20 years of
marketing communications, writing and PR involvement in the
hydronics, radiant heat, HVAC and broad home construction
industries. Email: cground@ptd.net.